EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-08-20 01:05 (296 d 13:23 ago) – Posting: # 21892
Views: 1,628

Hi ElMaestro,

» » A correlation >1 is funny.
» In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.

That’s another cup of tea. I guarantee that it can contain exactly 101.2% indeed – regardless what the CoA says. ;-)

» It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

Here you are right despite some weirdos laments.* The largest correlation in my 500 simulated data sets was for #168 with 7.285 (‼)…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,518 posts in 4,498 threads, 1,523 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 14:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If I find 10,000 ways something won’t work, I haven’t failed.
I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded
is another step forward.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz