EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Statistics]
Hi Hötzi,
thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.
In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.
thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.
❝ A correlation >1 is funny.
In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- EMA dataset I, can someone post results? ElMaestro 2020-08-14 20:54 [General Statistics]
- EMA dataset I, can someone post results? PharmCat 2020-08-14 22:09
- EMA dataset I, can someone post results? ElMaestro 2020-08-14 22:34
- EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) Helmut 2020-08-15 15:00
- EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) PharmCat 2020-08-16 00:57
- EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1)ElMaestro 2020-08-19 22:50
- EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) Helmut 2020-08-20 01:05
- EMA dataset I, can someone post results? PharmCat 2020-08-14 22:09