EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-08-20 00:50 (1537 d 05:47 ago) – Posting: # 21891
Views: 3,379

Hi Hötzi,

thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.

❝ A correlation >1 is funny.


In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,280 posts in 4,889 threads, 1,655 registered users;
62 visitors (0 registered, 62 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:37 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There is one certainty in drug development
and statistics that one can depend on:
the data are always late.    Scott Patterson and Byron Jones

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5