EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-08-20 00:50 (1284 d 16:00 ago) – Posting: # 21891
Views: 2,625

Hi Hötzi,

thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.

❝ A correlation >1 is funny.


In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,911 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,635 registered users;
34 visitors (1 registered, 33 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:51 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The history of statistics is like a telephone directory:
the plot is boring, full of numbers and the cast is endless.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5