EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-08-19 22:50 (296 d 14:37 ago) – Posting: # 21891
Views: 1,630

Hi Hötzi,

thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.

» A correlation >1 is funny.

In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,518 posts in 4,498 threads, 1,523 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 13:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If I find 10,000 ways something won’t work, I haven’t failed.
I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded
is another step forward.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5