EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-08-19 22:50 (34 d 11:47 ago) – Posting: # 21891
Views: 1,103

Hi Hötzi,

thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.

» A correlation >1 is funny.

In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

R's base package has 274 reserved words and operators, along with 1761 functions. I can use 18 of them (about 14 of them properly). I believe this makes me the Donald Trump of programming.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,071 posts in 4,393 threads, 1,466 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 10:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts
as to discover new ways of thinking about them.    William Henry Bragg

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5