EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-08-19 20:50 (200 d 08:45 ago) – Posting: # 21891
Views: 1,403

Hi Hötzi,

thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.

» A correlation >1 is funny.

In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,371 posts in 4,463 threads, 1,496 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 05:35 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents 
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5