EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-08-19 22:50 (103 d 11:04 ago) – Posting: # 21891
Views: 1,274

Hi Hötzi,

thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.

» A correlation >1 is funny.

In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

No, of course you do not need to audit your CRO if it was inspected in 1968 by the agency of Crabongostan.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,224 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 08:54 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The fundamental cause of trouble in the world today is
that the stupid are cocksure
while the intelligent are full of doubt.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5