EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-08-20 00:50 (1370 d 10:51 ago) – Posting: # 21891
Views: 2,854

Hi Hötzi,

thanks for WNL outputs with various covariance structures.

❝ A correlation >1 is funny.


In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.
It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,034 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,647 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Give me a fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own corrections.
You can keep your sterile truth for yourself.    Vilfredo Pareto

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5