Mixed models, did someone figure out lme? [R for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-08-11 18:23 (410 d 14:51 ago) – Posting: # 21858
Views: 1,153

Dear ElMaestro,

» ...
» For example: I prefer to play with variance components directly without involvement of rho (correlation) for the covariance of T and R. Where do I start? Playing around with weights, correlation structure, etc may get me what I want (see the two threads linked above), but that stil does not mean I am using lme meaningfully or optimally, I feel.

OK. That was my feeling in using Proc MIXED too.
And later on in the implementation via nlme/lme().

But life is no musical request programm ;-).
To have a stil you are satisfied with: Build your software by your own.

If I see your activity here in the forum (together with PharmCat) I think you will be able to do so. Contrary to me. Too small a brain to follow your posts. Even the easiest statements are out of my intellectual reach.

Thus I can't help. Sorry.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,700 posts in 4,538 threads, 1,542 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 09:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5