Mixed models, did someone figure out lme? [R for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-08-10 14:16 (72 d 21:31 ago) – Posting: # 21850
Views: 1,356

Hi all,


Oh, how life throws you a curve ball every now and then....

As you know I am writing optimisers and algos for REML fits for replicated and semireplicated BE designs.
For replicated (2x2x4) I'd like to have something to compare with. As I am neither rich nor well connected I can't get access to SAS or WinNonlin, but lucky me, there are free packages and functions in R for mixed models.
I gather lmer does not allow for different within-variances, so I am looking at lme.


Is lme the most hostile and poorly documented function ever in existence??
I have no idea how to use it after having read the docs approximately 50 million times; all I want is to fit a model with five variance components:
Within Ref, within Test, between Ref, between Test, and their covariance.

I once had the book by Pinheiro & Bates and it is a terrible document for anyone trying to get familiar with mixed models. I think it went into the burner a cold November night 10 years ago. You need to know and understand all structures and syntax examples before anything in that book makes sense. So nothing makes sense to me, obviously. A bit like real life, you might say.

So, I was thinking the bebac forum must come to my rescue and I read with equal amounts of joy and equal amounts of horror this old post written by one of the greatest of the truly great. :-D:party::crying:
:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D

Does it really have to be that hard??
I googled around but I have not really seen much about lme for BE. Where do I start, does anyone have suggestions on how to use lme for a 224BE design and be able to extract meaningful variance components? Did anyone since then figure out easier and possibly more meaningful ways to work with lme such that the model is clearly defined in an understandable way and such that extraction of swr and swt is not plain meaningless torture?

Mixed models are no good for my mental health.
Many thanks. :cool:

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

No, of course you do not need to audit your CRO if it was inspected in 1968 by the agency of Crabongostan.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,176 posts in 4,413 threads, 1,475 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 11:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is not so much that I have confidence in scientists being right,
but that I have so much in nonscientists being wrong.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5