Difference between BABE study and clinical trials [Design Issues]

posted by dshah  – India, 2020-07-31 12:46 (1502 d 06:42 ago) – Posting: # 21813
Views: 5,136

Dear VijithRoy!
As rightly mentioned by Helmut, BABE studies are considered as Phase-I study. Generally the concept for generics to perform BABE study is to use the already available knowledge of Innovator for safety and efficacy.
Apart from BCS based biowaiver;
A- Parenteral (IV, IM, SC, IT) adm. as aqueous solution;
B- Solution for oral use,
C-Gas ,
D- Powder for reconstitution as a solution (Meeting above A or B)
E- Otic or ophthalmic or topical product prepared as an aqueous solution
and few other dosage forms can be considered for biowaiver where BE is self evident.
On the other hand, Q1/Q2/Q3 criteria may needs to be matched to Innovator (case to case basis).

Regards,
DShah

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,223 posts in 4,877 threads, 1,656 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Explanations exist; they have existed for all time;
there is always an easy solution to every human problem –
neat, plausible and wrong.    H. L. Mencken

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5