Difference between BABE study and clinical trials [Design Issues]

posted by dshah – India, 2020-07-31 10:46 (10 d 02:13 ago) – Posting: # 21813
Views: 259

Dear VijithRoy!
As rightly mentioned by Helmut, BABE studies are considered as Phase-I study. Generally the concept for generics to perform BABE study is to use the already available knowledge of Innovator for safety and efficacy.
Apart from BCS based biowaiver;
A- Parenteral (IV, IM, SC, IT) adm. as aqueous solution;
B- Solution for oral use,
C-Gas ,
D- Powder for reconstitution as a solution (Meeting above A or B)
E- Otic or ophthalmic or topical product prepared as an aqueous solution
and few other dosage forms can be considered for biowaiver where BE is self evident.
On the other hand, Q1/Q2/Q3 criteria may needs to be matched to Innovator (case to case basis).

Regards,
DShah

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,992 posts in 4,375 threads, 1,460 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 13:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5