Subject-by-Formulation interaction? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-22 12:03 (90 d 22:12 ago) – Posting: # 21775
Views: 680

Hi Loky do,

» Now another case for a non highly variable drug, […]

What you confirmed already:What is still possible:
» Is it applicable to consider these subjects as outliers, is there any way to conclude this?

That’s similar to the cases we discussed before. Even if you would perform a statistical test (which is not acceptable acc. to current regulatory practice), you would get a p-value of 0.2453 which would speak against excluding them. Even for Health Canada (where an outlier assessment of studentized model residuals can be done if pre-specified in the protocol) you could exclude only one subject (≤5% if the sample size is ≥20).

» or could we re-dose them again to be confirmed?

Re-dosing is discouraged and likely not accepted.

» or simply the product fails :-|?

I’m afraid, yes.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,171 posts in 4,412 threads, 1,475 registered users;
online 13 (1 registered, 12 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 10:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

But it is in matters beyond the limits of mere rule
that the skill of the analyst is evinced.
He makes in silence a host of observations and inferences…    Edgar Allan Poe

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5