Reanalysis for PK Reason: Gone with the Wind [Bioanalytics]

posted by Obinoscopy  – USA, 2020-07-20 16:12 (920 d 08:13 ago) – Posting: # 21761
Views: 4,121

Hi Dshah

time concentration 1 concentration 2 concentration 3 concentration 4

❝ AUC      826.125         826.375         826.625         826.75


❝ I believe that such small change in AUC can be considered non-significant. :-)


I agree with you that these changes are very little. But you'd be amazed at how the difference between 826.125 and 826.375 is enough to make a study that failed (eg CI of T/R: 79.99 - 111.11) to pass (eg CI of T/R: 80.02 - 111.11).

Regards,

Scopy

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,477 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,603 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:25 CET (Europe/Vienna)

We must be careful not to confuse data with the abstractions
we use to analyze them.    William James

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5