Reanalysis for PK Reason: Gone with the Wind [Bioanalytics]

posted by Obinoscopy  – USA, 2020-07-20 14:12 (184 d 01:04 ago) – Posting: # 21761
Views: 2,060

Hi Dshah

» time concentration 1 concentration 2 concentration 3 concentration 4
» AUC      826.125         826.375         826.625         826.75

» I believe that such small change in AUC can be considered non-significant. :-)

I agree with you that these changes are very little. But you'd be amazed at how the difference between 826.125 and 826.375 is enough to make a study that failed (eg CI of T/R: 79.99 - 111.11) to pass (eg CI of T/R: 80.02 - 111.11).

Regards,

Scopy

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,308 posts in 4,444 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 14:16 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5