Reanalysis for PK Reason: Gone with the Wind [Bioanalytics]

posted by Obinoscopy  – USA, 2020-07-20 14:12 (705 d 14:17 ago) – Posting: # 21761
Views: 3,807

Hi Dshah

» time concentration 1 concentration 2 concentration 3 concentration 4
» AUC      826.125         826.375         826.625         826.75

» I believe that such small change in AUC can be considered non-significant. :-)

I agree with you that these changes are very little. But you'd be amazed at how the difference between 826.125 and 826.375 is enough to make a study that failed (eg CI of T/R: 79.99 - 111.11) to pass (eg CI of T/R: 80.02 - 111.11).

Regards,

Scopy

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,167 posts in 4,645 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 04:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The person interested in success has to learn
to view failure as a healthy, inevitable part
of the process of getting to the top.    Joyce Brothers

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5