Reanalysis for PK Reason: Gone with the Wind [Bioanalytics]

posted by Obinoscopy  – USA, 2020-07-20 12:12 (130 d 07:40 ago) – Posting: # 21761
Views: 1,905

Hi Dshah

» time concentration 1 concentration 2 concentration 3 concentration 4
» AUC      826.125         826.375         826.625         826.75

» I believe that such small change in AUC can be considered non-significant. :-)

I agree with you that these changes are very little. But you'd be amazed at how the difference between 826.125 and 826.375 is enough to make a study that failed (eg CI of T/R: 79.99 - 111.11) to pass (eg CI of T/R: 80.02 - 111.11).

Regards,

Scopy

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,214 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 19:52 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5