Reanalysis for PK Reason: Gone with the Wind [Bioanalytics]

posted by Obinoscopy  – USA, 2020-07-20 14:12 (191 d 07:12 ago) – Posting: # 21761
Views: 2,101

Hi Dshah

» time concentration 1 concentration 2 concentration 3 concentration 4
» AUC      826.125         826.375         826.625         826.75

» I believe that such small change in AUC can be considered non-significant. :-)

I agree with you that these changes are very little. But you'd be amazed at how the difference between 826.125 and 826.375 is enough to make a study that failed (eg CI of T/R: 79.99 - 111.11) to pass (eg CI of T/R: 80.02 - 111.11).

Regards,

Scopy

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,317 posts in 4,447 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 20:24 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5