PK modeling in BE [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-19 14:35 (1401 d 21:54 ago) – Posting: # 21749
Views: 3,932

Hi mittyri,

❝ Are you referring to this one?


Nope, an even worse one. I’ll send it to you by PM.
If you have nothing better to do, watch this recording (navigate to 01:27:02 for the presentation “Improved bioequivalence assessment through model-informed and model-based strategies”) of the 2020 Generic Drug Regulatory Science Initiatives Public Workshop.

Slide 14 (left) shows the Type I Errors for the standard NCA and the model based approach. Why should be even their average in NCA >5%? Sumfink stinks here.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,034 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,647 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Give me a fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own corrections.
You can keep your sterile truth for yourself.    Vilfredo Pareto

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5