Sequence codes irrelevant [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-19 11:17 (300 d 04:18 ago) – Posting: # 21748
Views: 1,049

No Loky do,

it is not relevant how you code sequences and in which order. You could call them trousers.shirt.shirt, shirt.trousers.shirt, shirt.shirt.trousers as well. You have only to adapt the SAS-code at the end of the guidance’s page 4 accordingly.

Why on earth do you want a partial replicate design?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,462 posts in 4,487 threads, 1,514 registered users;
online 15 (0 registered, 15 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 15:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

By all means let’s be open-minded, but not so open-minded
that our brains drop out.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5