Sequence codes irrelevant [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-19 11:17 (797 d 12:42 ago) – Posting: # 21748
Views: 1,621

No Loky do,

it is not relevant how you code sequences and in which order. You could call them trousers.shirt.shirt, shirt.trousers.shirt, shirt.shirt.trousers as well. You have only to adapt the SAS-code at the end of the guidance’s page 4 accordingly.

Why on earth do you want a partial replicate design?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,385 posts in 4,684 threads, 1,594 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 23:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

When someone says his conclusions are objective,
he means that they are based on prejudices
which many other people share.    Celia Green

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz