Reanalysis for PK Reason: Gone with the Wind [Bioanalytics]

posted by dshah  – India, 2020-07-17 08:40 (1642 d 18:58 ago) – Posting: # 21729
Views: 7,846

Greetings team!

I believe that Helmut is correct and without a predefined SOP for repeat analysis, repeat would not be acceptable!

If we are focusing on root cause, I believe that for pre-dose concentration even in period-I would not cause a significant issue to final BE out come as it may only impact AUC and it would not be significant. :-D If the value is MT 5% of Cmax, the subject would by default not considered for statistical evaluation :-). And for Root cause- most of CRO are not able to identify and thus there would not be a CAPA. :confused:


Thanks,
Dshah


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,362 posts in 4,906 threads, 1,673 registered users;
98 visitors (0 registered, 98 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:38 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I have not failed 700 times. I have not failed once.
I have succeeded in proving
that those 700 ways will not work.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5