Reanalysis for PK Reason: Gone with the Wind [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2020-07-16 19:15 (802 d 21:04 ago) – Posting: # 21721
Views: 4,477

Dear Helmut,

» » » According to the current guidelines (EMA 2011, FDA 2018, ICH draft 2019) it is no more acceptable. IMHO, bad science.
» »
» » Agreed.
»
» Agreed on what? That is not acceptable or that it is bad science?

That it is bad science, of course ! To accept as a matter of principle data which are obviously incorrect, and to refuse as a matter of principle for these data to be corrected, is something I fail to understand.

I understand that assessors may be suspicious if there were some re-analyses for PK reasons. If the study is only borderline passing, they always have the possibility to perform (or ask for) a statistical analysis with the original data. Depending on the outcome, they may ask for an inspection.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,391 posts in 4,685 threads, 1,594 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 16:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics. A sort of elementary form of mathematics which consists of
adding things together and occasionally squaring them.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5