Desultory thoughts [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-07-16 01:06 (924 d 22:18 ago) – Posting: # 21705
Views: 14,641

Hi Hötzi,

❝ ❝ to me it is exactly the opposite way around:

❝ ❝ A model with more than one variance component is a mixed model.


❝ Not necessarily. It depends on what you believe [sic] is a random effect. Treatment, sequence, and period are fixed effects, right? IMHO, subject is random. When we think about interaction(s) we enter the gray zone, of course.


May I offer the completely opposite view? Search the forum for "bogus statement" :-D, check the SAS documentation for what the statement actually actually does to Proc GLM:
When ProcGLM is used for 222BE with or without the bogus statement it still means a normal linear model is fit (even when the theory in e.g. C&L calls it "random"). There is a single variance component in such fits. If you wish to verify it: There is a model matrix with columns for subjects; check the df's for such models, it would be (much) higher if subjects were fit as random. Conversely, if subject were random subject would not appear as a factor in the anova.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,477 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,603 registered users;
13 visitors (0 registered, 13 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:25 CET (Europe/Vienna)

We must be careful not to confuse data with the abstractions
we use to analyze them.    William James

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5