Braveheart! [R for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-11 15:38 (108 d 07:52 ago) – Posting: # 21674
Views: 10,149

Hi ElMaestro,

» it is rather experimental.

:-D

» […] which means we have:
» A variance for T (combined within and between)
» A variance for within-R
» A variance for between-R

Correct. Will be interesting what you get because \(\sigma_{wT}^2+\sigma_{bT}^2\):
0.04367 (Phoenix) and 0.03771 (SAS).

» Hessian, positive definite, etc.. [image]all this comes down to the details of SAS's or WinNonlin's optimiser. I am playing around with optim in R (BFGS, L-BFGS-B bounded, and Nelder-Mead) and with one of my own making.

If you succeed, the community will love you. Might win you the Fields medal.

As long as a genius (you?) is not able to come up with a solution working in all cases, I can only repeat:

Avoid partial replicate designs!

It might not be possible to evaluate the study for ABE (though RSABE works in any case).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 22:30 CET (Europe/Vienna)

No computer has ever been designed
that is ever aware of what it’s doing;
but most of the time, we aren’t either.    Marvin Minsky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5