SAP? [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-03 17:31 (474 d 03:39 ago) – Posting: # 21649
Views: 2,035

Hi Mahmoud,

» Dear Dr

Still not a Dr. Told you before.

» in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that
» CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies

Truth does not belong to the realm of science. :-D

» From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra

Correct; sometimes CVintra > CVinter.

» I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results

Why, can you elaborate?

» » Are you trying to “safe” a failed study?
» No

I see. Please answer my other question (also in the subject line)

» » What is stated in the SAP?

as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,749 posts in 4,547 threads, 1,545 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Mediocrity finds safety in standardization.    Frederick E. Crane

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5