SAP? [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-03 19:31 (948 d 22:20 ago) – Posting: # 21649
Views: 3,251

Hi Mahmoud,

Dear Dr


Still not a doctor. Told you before.

❝ in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that

❝ CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies


Truth does not belong to the realm of science. :-D

❝ From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra


Correct; sometimes CVintra > CVinter.

❝ I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results


Why, can you elaborate?

❝ ❝ Are you trying to “safe” a failed study?

❝ No


I see. Please answer my other question (also in the subject line) as well:

❝ ❝ What is stated in the SAP?


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,485 posts in 4,710 threads, 1,603 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:52 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5