SAP? [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-07-03 17:31 (208 d 05:10 ago) – Posting: # 21649
Views: 1,441

Hi Mahmoud,

» Dear Dr

Not a Dr ;-)

» in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that
» CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies

Truth does not belong to the realm of science. :-D

» From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra

Correct; sometimes CVintra > CVinter.

» I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results

Why, can you elaborate?

» » Are you trying to “safe” a failed study?
» No

I see. Please answer my other question (also in the subject line)

» » What is stated in the SAP?

as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,317 posts in 4,447 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:42 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5