SAP? [Software]

posted by Mahmoud  – Jordan, 2020-07-03 19:17 (1829 d 09:52 ago) – Posting: # 21648
Views: 7,162

Dear Dr

Thank you very much for your information

in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that

CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies

From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra

I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results

❝ Are you trying to “rescue” a failed study?


No


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,680 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5