SAP? [Software]

posted by Mahmoud  – Jordan, 2020-07-03 19:17 (1414 d 14:11 ago) – Posting: # 21648
Views: 4,664

Dear Dr

Thank you very much for your information

in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that

CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies

From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra

I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results

❝ Are you trying to “rescue” a failed study?


No


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,029 posts in 4,834 threads, 1,641 registered users;
37 visitors (0 registered, 37 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The most erroneous stories are those we think we know best–
and therefore never scrutinize or question.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5