SAP? [Software]

posted by Mahmoud  – Jordan, 2020-07-03 17:17 (765 d 10:34 ago) – Posting: # 21648
Views: 2,567

Dear Dr

Thank you very much for your information

in This study I found that and for Cmax Pk that

CVintra =27.3217 and CVinter=20.7271 this is not true in BE studies

From most studies CVinter is more more than CVintra

I think that the two types=CSH or FA0(1) in the FDA code are not suitable to obtain these results

» Are you trying to “rescue” a failed study?

No


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,288 posts in 4,665 threads, 1,583 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 03:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5