You’ve lost me now. [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-06-28 19:55  – Posting: # 21587
Views: 1,204

Hi ElMaestro,

» Let us go over it again:
» Let x be our sample.
» Let f(x|other shit) be a function of x, given some other shit.
» Let g(x|other shit) be another function of x, given the same other shit.

Like this (or any other funny transformation)?

other.shit <- function(x, funny) {
  eval(funny)
}
x <- rnorm(100, mean = 100, sd = 20)
f <- other.shit(x, funny = x^2)
g <- other.shit(x, funny = sqrt(x))
cor(f, g)
plot(f, g, las = 1, xlab = "f(x)", ylab = "g(x)")


» In general (and ideally layman's) terms, what properties of f and g would lead me to think f and g are independent.
»
» I assume it is implied that we are talking about independence from each other, at least when we try and think of f and g as numerators and denominators of the quantity defining t above. When this is the wrong perception, kindly correct me, please.

Completely confused. Can you try again, please?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,802 posts in 4,355 threads, 1,446 registered users;
online 17 (0 registered, 17 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:42 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Medical statistician: One who will not accept that Columbus discovered America…
because he said he was looking for India in the trial plan.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5