Still none the wiser [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-28 18:20 (207 d 06:52 ago) – Posting: # 21586
Views: 2,877

Hi Helmut,

thanks for trying. I have to admit, I am sorry but I am none the wiser.:-D
Let us go over it again:
Let x be our sample.
Let f(x|other shit) be a function of x, given some other shit.
Let g(x|other shit) be another function of x, given the same other shit.

In general (and ideally layman's) terms, what properties of f and g would lead me to think f and g are independent.

I assume it is implied that we are talking about independence from each other, at least when we try and think of f and g as numerators and denominators of the quantity defining t above. When this is the wrong perception, kindly correct me, please.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,310 posts in 4,445 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 00:13 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is, or should be, about scientific investigation
and how to do it better, but many statisticians believe
it is a branch of mathematics.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5