Still none the wiser [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-28 20:20 (1558 d 13:30 ago) – Posting: # 21586
Views: 5,501

Hi Helmut,

thanks for trying. I have to admit, I am sorry but I am none the wiser.:-D
Let us go over it again:
Let x be our sample.
Let f(x|other shit) be a function of x, given some other shit.
Let g(x|other shit) be another function of x, given the same other shit.

In general (and ideally layman's) terms, what properties of f and g would lead me to think f and g are independent.

I assume it is implied that we are talking about independence from each other, at least when we try and think of f and g as numerators and denominators of the quantity defining t above. When this is the wrong perception, kindly correct me, please.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,240 posts in 4,884 threads, 1,652 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[The] impatience with ambiguity can be criticized in the phrase:
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5