EMA: AUC72 for all IR products [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-06-24 12:47 (1624 d 13:05 ago) – Posting: # 21571
Views: 2,997

Hi Loky do,

❝ For certain products, ema product-specific bioequivalence guidance states that the main PK variables: AUC0-72,...etc (also stated in the study protocol),


Not only the ones in product-specific guidances but all IR products (BE-GL page 9):

A sampling period longer than 72 h is therefore not considered necessary for any immediate release formulation irrespective of the half life of the drug.


❝ Is that mean any subject who miss 72 h will be excluded from AUC0-72 calculations?


No. If you have a reliable estimate of λz (at least three concentrations), you may use an estimate – if the exact method is stated in the protocol. E.g., in Phoenix/WinNonlin specify pAUC72 and you are fine. There are many posts in the forum discussing the details.

❝ if yes, there will be around 25% of subjects missed this interval, is that will be acceptable?


In principle yes but as an assessor I would question the clinical performance of the CRO.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,332 posts in 4,899 threads, 1,660 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:52 CET (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5