EMA: AUC72 for all IR products [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-06-24 12:47 (959 d 23:16 ago) – Posting: # 21571
Views: 1,865

Hi Loky do,

❝ For certain products, ema product-specific bioequivalence guidance states that the main PK variables: AUC0-72,...etc (also stated in the study protocol),


Not only the ones in product-specific guidances but all IR products (BE-GL page 9):

A sampling period longer than 72 h is therefore not considered necessary for any immediate release formulation irrespective of the half life of the drug.


❝ Is that mean any subject who miss 72 h will be excluded from AUC0-72 calculations?


No. If you have a reliable estimate of λz (at least three concentrations), you may use an estimate – if the exact method is stated in the protocol. E.g., in Phoenix/WinNonlin specify pAUC72 and you are fine. There are many posts in the forum discussing the details.

❝ if yes, there will be around 25% of subjects missed this interval, is that will be acceptable?


In principle yes but as an assessor I would question the clinical performance of the CRO.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,489 posts in 4,711 threads, 1,605 registered users;
13 visitors (0 registered, 13 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:03 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5