Reference ranges, prediction intervals [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2020-06-22 15:38 (123 d 22:57 ago) – Posting: # 21560
Views: 421

Dear ElMaestro,

» Thinking very hard about it I have not ever seen any CRO use the prediction interval approach to define ref. ranges.

I can't remember ever seeing a path lab defining their own reference ranges: whether CRO, central lab involved in Phase III trials, or the lab next door where I had my cholesterol level measured once some years ago (I never went back: what you don't know won't hurt you). Whenever I asked, the answer was that they were taking the ranges recommended by the vendor of the machine and reagents. Which may have been determined in a rather different population on another continent.

Actually I worked for some time at a hospital lab which was involved in such an exercise on behalf of the manufacturer, to establish the normal ranges for thyroid hormones on a new lab machine. They even used a sample of my own blood (talk about freely given consent). Not sure there was much statistics involved then.

» After WHO published their rule about aberrant hemoglobin a few years back, some CROs revised their reference ranges in funny ways so that anyone on the brink of keeling over due to anemia could still be enrolled. [...] But I digress, this latter aspect is more a question of low ethical standards than a question of reference ranges.

:angry: :vomit:

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 14:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding
to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives.    Francis Bacon

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5