Cauchy distribution [NCA / SHAM]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-20 12:33 (962 d 04:06 ago) – Posting: # 21551
Views: 4,424

Hi mittyri,

❝ Here ya go: Cauchy distribution


The Cauchy distribution is relevant to this question only to the extent that we can assume ln(T)=ln(R) when both have zero mean. It is thus a special case only, and therefore one that does not in practice correspond to the generally relevant question.
In perspective, history has been somewhat cruel to anyone assume T=R for example in relation to power and sampe sizes. In other words, what is needed (if there is a need at all?!?) is a "Cauchy distribution with the equivalent of a noncentrality parameter", for lack of better wording.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,485 posts in 4,710 threads, 1,603 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:39 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5