OT: Bias of AUCt, AUCall, pAUC [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-09 08:45 (498 d 12:18 ago) – Posting: # 21514
Views: 7,455

Hi again Helmut,

there is no doubt that AUC calculation can be biased. Whether the ln difference or ratio is biased, generally, is another matter and this is where I meant to draw the attention - this is the BE outcome. If one could make a case for saying that this bias affects T more often or to a larger extent than it affects R, generally, then that is where the use of this approach would be not just ugly but even worse also clearly biased.
I am not aware this would or should be the case.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,749 posts in 4,547 threads, 1,545 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Mediocrity finds safety in standardization.    Frederick E. Crane

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5