OT: Bias of AUCt, AUCall, pAUC [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-09 08:45 (225 d 13:37 ago) – Posting: # 21514
Views: 5,149

Hi again Helmut,

there is no doubt that AUC calculation can be biased. Whether the ln difference or ratio is biased, generally, is another matter and this is where I meant to draw the attention - this is the BE outcome. If one could make a case for saying that this bias affects T more often or to a larger extent than it affects R, generally, then that is where the use of this approach would be not just ugly but even worse also clearly biased.
I am not aware this would or should be the case.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,308 posts in 4,444 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:23 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5