OT: Bias of AUCt, AUCall, pAUC [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-06-09 08:45  – Posting: # 21514
Views: 3,274

Hi again Helmut,

there is no doubt that AUC calculation can be biased. Whether the ln difference or ratio is biased, generally, is another matter and this is where I meant to draw the attention - this is the BE outcome. If one could make a case for saying that this bias affects T more often or to a larger extent than it affects R, generally, then that is where the use of this approach would be not just ugly but even worse also clearly biased.
I am not aware this would or should be the case.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

"Pass or fail" (D. Potvin et al., 2008)

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,795 posts in 4,354 threads, 1,446 registered users;
online 9 (0 registered, 9 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m not a pessimist,
I’m just a well informed optimist.    José Saramago

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5