OT: Bias of AUCt, AUCall, pAUC [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-09 08:45 (717 d 06:37 ago) – Posting: # 21514
Views: 8,681

Hi again Helmut,

there is no doubt that AUC calculation can be biased. Whether the ln difference or ratio is biased, generally, is another matter and this is where I meant to draw the attention - this is the BE outcome. If one could make a case for saying that this bias affects T more often or to a larger extent than it affects R, generally, then that is where the use of this approach would be not just ugly but even worse also clearly biased.
I am not aware this would or should be the case.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,108 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 13 (1 registered, 12 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 15:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5