OT: Bias of AUCt, AUCall, pAUC [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-09 10:45 (972 d 21:08 ago) – Posting: # 21514
Views: 9,702

Hi again Helmut,

there is no doubt that AUC calculation can be biased. Whether the ln difference or ratio is biased, generally, is another matter and this is where I meant to draw the attention - this is the BE outcome. If one could make a case for saying that this bias affects T more often or to a larger extent than it affects R, generally, then that is where the use of this approach would be not just ugly but even worse also clearly biased.
I am not aware this would or should be the case.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,481 posts in 4,710 threads, 1,603 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:53 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5