Bizarre paper [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-06-08 15:33 (589 d 18:59 ago) – Posting: # 21511
Views: 8,217

Hi all,

possibly a little off topic but even with AUCall in all its ugliness and over-estimation, it will not necessarily imply a bias on the BE conclusion unless someone can prove that E(ln(AUCall,T - ln(AUCall,R)) does not equal E(ln(AUCT) - ln(AUCR)), regardless of whether the latter is expressed as AUCinf or AUCt.

This isn't about imagining scenarios where the equality does not hold (that would be easy enough) but a consideration of the general (expected) case. For the general case I think we're ok.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,831 posts in 4,567 threads, 1,553 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 09:33 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Research under a paradigm must be a particularly effective way
of inducing paradigm change.    Thomas S. Kuhn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5