Bizarre paper [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-06-08 15:33  – Posting: # 21511
Views: 3,374

Hi all,

possibly a little off topic but even with AUCall in all its ugliness and over-estimation, it will not necessarily imply a bias on the BE conclusion unless someone can prove that E(ln(AUCall,T - ln(AUCall,R)) does not equal E(ln(AUCT) - ln(AUCR)), regardless of whether the latter is expressed as AUCinf or AUCt.

This isn't about imagining scenarios where the equality does not hold (that would be easy enough) but a consideration of the general (expected) case. For the general case I think we're ok.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,

"Pass or fail" (D. Potvin et al., 2008)

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
20,793 posts in 4,353 threads, 1,445 registered users;
online 29 (0 registered, 29 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In God we trust;
all others must bring data.    W. Edwards Deming

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz