(2×2×2?) ANOVA instead of mixed model [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-06-01 15:08 (112 d 22:08 ago) – Posting: # 21495
Views: 445

Hi Siva Krishna,

some hints:
» How can we justify this failure. please help to my friend.

Justify cherry-picking? Imagine you are an assessor. You have two evaluations on the desk. One deviating from the guidance – passing – and another one acc. to the guidance – failing. What would you do? Let’s reverse this game. You have another study passing acc. to the guidance and plan to submit it. Just for fun you assess it by an ANOVA and it fails. Would you present that? I doubt it.

P.S.: I suggest that you friend registers here. Possibly we have more questions and it’s more efficient to get background information directly than playing Chinese Whispers.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,069 posts in 4,392 threads, 1,467 registered users;
online 11 (1 registered, 10 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 13:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Everybody is a Bayesian.
It’s just that some know it, and some don’t.    Trivellore Raghunathan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5