Duplicate LLOQ and ULOQ [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-05-27 16:30 (513 d 18:13 ago) – Posting: # 21484
Views: 5,903

Dear Ohlbe,

» Most frequent: use the first result only. If, and only if it fails (more than 20% deviation at the LLOQ, 15% at the ULOQ): exclude it and use the second. The aim being of course to avoid having to truncate the curve in case of failure.
»
» I see this less and less often. Not sure why (guess: some FDA inspectors did not like it).

Count me in. If you analyzed duplicates, use them.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,753 posts in 4,548 threads, 1,544 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 10:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5