Duplicate LLOQ and ULOQ [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-05-27 16:30 (328 d 23:35 ago) – Posting: # 21484
Views: 5,142

Dear Ohlbe,

» Most frequent: use the first result only. If, and only if it fails (more than 20% deviation at the LLOQ, 15% at the ULOQ): exclude it and use the second. The aim being of course to avoid having to truncate the curve in case of failure.
»
» I see this less and less often. Not sure why (guess: some FDA inspectors did not like it).

Count me in. If you analyzed duplicates, use them.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 16:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5