An example of IS response. Need your helps. [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2020-05-26 14:42 (561 d 03:44 ago) – Posting: # 21472
Views: 6,346

Dear Shuanghe,

» However, from pure bioanalytical point of view, in my opinion, there's clearly something wrong here.


» If runs like this are deemed acceptable according to SOP and not even trig an investigation, I don't care what the creteria is, the SOP may need to be revised.


» At the least, the samples from 2nd half of the run should be repeated. I would repeat the whole run.

I would try and understand what happened first, and look at the whole set of information very closely. Anything else that varied here, such as retention times ?

It doesn't look like a subject-specific phenomenon: the QC samples are affected the same way. By the way, how are the results of the last 6 QC samples ? If even the last ones are passing, you could conclude that whatever is happening does not appear to have a large effect on accuracy. I'd still be concerned, until I understand what's going on. The calibration curve is not repeated at the end of the run, so there is no way to check what's happening at the ULOQ, where you may get linearity issues due to detector saturation or ion suppression of the analyte by the IS.


Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,788 posts in 4,557 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 17:26 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There is no adequate defense, except stupidity,
against the impact of a new idea.    Percy Williams Bridgman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz