Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Stratify for sex?

Stratify for sex? [Design Issues]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2020-05-25 23:10 (1871 d 15:59 ago) – Posting: # 21465
Views: 6,484

Hi Helmut,

I was referring to generating the randomization list (you know, unlike the CRO who put first 10 males and next 10 females..)

❝ Reduced chance to “grab her by the p••••y” whilst lining up for phlebotomy.

❝ ❝ No I did not find that funny when I spoke w them.

❝ I would.

Well if I had good impression of their overall capability, yes... But on not that day...

J

Edit: two successive posts merged [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

Inclusion criteria in BE studies Loky do 2020-05-22 18:16 [Design Issues]
- BE: ♀♂ Helmut 2020-05-23 17:12
- Inclusion criteria in BE studies jag009 2020-05-25 07:43
  - Stratify for sex? Helmut 2020-05-25 12:48
    - Stratify for sex?jag009 2020-05-25 21:10
- Inclusion criteria in BE studies ElMaestro 2020-05-25 14:39
  - Inclusion criteria in BE studies Loky do 2020-06-10 13:19
  - Inclusion criteria in BE studies BEQool 2023-05-05 10:42
    - Sex-by-treatment interaction Helmut 2023-05-05 12:44
      - Sex-by-treatment interaction BEQool 2023-05-11 09:12

Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,682 registered users;
51 visitors (0 registered, 51 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge. Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz