Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Stratify for sex?

Stratify for sex? [Design Issues]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2020-05-25 23:10 (1662 d 08:28 ago) – Posting: # 21465
Views: 5,091

Hi Helmut,

I was referring to generating the randomization list (you know, unlike the CRO who put first 10 males and next 10 females..)

❝ Reduced chance to “grab her by the p••••y” whilst lining up for phlebotomy.

❝ ❝ No I did not find that funny when I spoke w them.

❝ I would.

Well if I had good impression of their overall capability, yes... But on not that day...

J

Edit: two successive posts merged [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

Inclusion criteria in BE studies Loky do 2020-05-22 18:16 [Design Issues]
- BE: ♀♂ Helmut 2020-05-23 17:12
- Inclusion criteria in BE studies jag009 2020-05-25 07:43
  - Stratify for sex? Helmut 2020-05-25 12:48
    - Stratify for sex?jag009 2020-05-25 21:10
- Inclusion criteria in BE studies ElMaestro 2020-05-25 14:39
  - Inclusion criteria in BE studies Loky do 2020-06-10 13:19
  - Inclusion criteria in BE studies BEQool 2023-05-05 10:42
    - Sex-by-treatment interaction Helmut 2023-05-05 12:44
      - Sex-by-treatment interaction BEQool 2023-05-11 09:12

Admin contact
23,336 posts in 4,902 threads, 1,698 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:38 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current. Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz