Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Problems with PASS

Problems with PASS [Software]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2020-05-15 19:45 (862 d 04:58 ago) – Posting: # 21444
Views: 3,950

Dear Helmut, dear ElMaestro,

» » I could be wrong but...
»
» We all may be but…

Me too. Especially me :-D

.

Just my 2 cents.
Differences between PASS and PowerTOST w.r.t replicate cross-over designs

PASS uses degrees of freedom from an cross-over ANOVA having a carry-over term
PowerTOST uses only the usual terms treatment, period, sequence and subject
The design constant for the 2x2x4 design is 1.1 instead of 1.0 in PowerTOST
The power is calculated approximately in PASS via the shifted central t-distribution
For log-transformed data the approximation CV ~ se is used in PASS (!).
se is the standard error of the residuals.

Especially the last feature is due to the differences in the sample sizes got from PASS compared to. My recommendations supporting Helmut's recommendations above:
Don't use the sample sizes for replicate designs obtained by PASS because

They rely on statistics not used in the evaluation of the study
They rely on crude approximations, especially on CV ~ se which may work for small CVs but is beyond repair for higher values

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Problems with PASS Helmut 2020-05-15 12:31 [Software]
- Problems with PASS ElMaestro 2020-05-15 13:01
  - Problems with PASS Helmut 2020-05-15 13:42
    - Problems with PASS ElMaestro 2020-05-15 19:02
    - Problems with PASSd_labes 2020-05-15 19:45
      - Problems with PASS Helmut 2020-05-15 23:20
- PASS <2000? Helmut 2020-05-17 14:34
  - PASS 2020 d_labes 2020-05-17 17:01
    - PASS 2020! Helmut 2020-05-17 17:34
- PASS 2020: Outcome Helmut 2020-05-21 18:43
  - Customer satisfaction mittyri 2020-05-24 22:12