Problems with PASS [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-05-15 13:42 (126 d 02:47 ago) – Posting: # 21442
Views: 2,026

Hi ElMaestro,

» I could be wrong but...

We all may be but…

» PASS may be assuming this is a case of two sample t-test-like-scenario,…

It does (according to the manual and given in the output).

» … where it does not take into consideration that the actual model causes additional reduction of df's.

Yep, that’s the point! It gives me an answer to a question I did not ask (a model nobody uses for ages). Since I played around with the trial version, I can now say that it is a black 📦.
At least for the replicate designs the carryover model is hardcoded, not specified in the manual, and there is no way to change that.
I just sent an email to NCSS’ support asking for a clarification.

» You may be able to approximately reproduce PASS' result if you can override the df's in PowerTOST.

Maybe.

» I would still anyday say PowerTOST is more right than PASS, of course.

:cool:

I like this one:
[image]
Of course, PASS passes IQ and OQ. Remember what you once wrote?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,068 posts in 4,392 threads, 1,463 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 16:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie–
deliberate, contrived and dishonest—but the myth—
persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.    John F. Kennedy

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5