Xeon (workstation, server) ↔ Core iX (desktop) [R for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-05-01 23:22 (354 d 01:59 ago) – Posting: # 21385
Views: 14,003

Hi Yung-jin,

» » Five years old Xeon @3.4GHz (not overclocked), 16MB, 64bit Win 7.
» No way! Xeon CPU?

Yessir!

» unless you assemble the motherboard yourself.

Nope. ASUS P9D WS.

[image]

» However, I heard Xeon is a great …

Yes.

» … and cheaper CPU.

On the contrary and for a reason.

» Some people get Xeon from retired server machines. It is not so easy to find the motherboard from the market to fit Xeon right now. So it's a very special PC. Indeed.

It’s a workstation. All Xeons (for servers and workstations) have their desktop counterparts with the same architecture. For my Xeon it’s a Core i3. The main differences are: Generally larger L3-cache, require motherboards with other chip­sets than desktop systems supporting server-grade unbuffered [image] ECC RAM, rated for continuous 100% CPU load.
Since I regularly run simulations 24/7 (for weeks) and a [image] [email protected]-client, the last two points are important for me.
All this stuff is more expensive: Such mainboards are produced in much lower numbers, the EEC RAM is more complex, and last but not least the CPU itself.
Previously I had Dell workstations with double Xeons (i.e., before multi-cores were available) but the howling fans drove me crazy. Now I have a fan­less system (including the graphics card) with monstrous copper-coolers and double heatpipes. Weighs ~20 kg and came for 2,550 € in 2014 (2 × 256GB SSD, 4TB HD, GTX750 Ti, DVD writer, 430W PSU). The silence is deafening. :-D

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 01:21 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5