Missing samples [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Amira Gouda – Egypt, 2020-05-01 23:50 (139 d 16:03 ago) – Posting: # 21383
Views: 1,999

Hi ElMaestro,

thanks for your reply

» This guy is clearly not participating PP, his AUC is not outright a meaningful indicator of product performance, so out he goes, I think.

Yes, he actually missed the terminal phase, his AUC0-t is about 17% of his AUC0-inf, also check his figure


What we could do?

1- Extrapolate to 72 h
2- Use AUC common (0-12)
3- or based on the results of the current study could we make another stage on 12 subjects (knowing that the first one was performed on 24)?
4- Exclude the subject from stat evaluation of AUC(0-t) and include in all other parameters (as long as it does not jeopardize the acceptance of the study)

looking forward to your opinion

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,068 posts in 4,392 threads, 1,463 registered users;
online 15 (0 registered, 15 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 15:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie–
deliberate, contrived and dishonest—but the myth—
persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.    John F. Kennedy

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz