Missing samples [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Amira Gouda – Egypt, 2020-05-01 23:50 (172 d 00:48 ago) – Posting: # 21383
Views: 2,064

Hi ElMaestro,

thanks for your reply

» This guy is clearly not participating PP, his AUC is not outright a meaningful indicator of product performance, so out he goes, I think.

Yes, he actually missed the terminal phase, his AUC0-t is about 17% of his AUC0-inf, also check his figure

[image]

What we could do?

1- Extrapolate to 72 h
2- Use AUC common (0-12)
3- or based on the results of the current study could we make another stage on 12 subjects (knowing that the first one was performed on 24)?
4- Exclude the subject from stat evaluation of AUC(0-t) and include in all other parameters (as long as it does not jeopardize the acceptance of the study)

looking forward to your opinion
thanks

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,170 posts in 4,411 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 00:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

But it is in matters beyond the limits of mere rule
that the skill of the analyst is evinced.
He makes in silence a host of observations and inferences…    Edgar Allan Poe

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5