Missing samples [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Amira Gouda – Egypt, 2020-05-01 23:50 (354 d 03:37 ago) – Posting: # 21383
Views: 2,390

Hi ElMaestro,

thanks for your reply

» This guy is clearly not participating PP, his AUC is not outright a meaningful indicator of product performance, so out he goes, I think.

Yes, he actually missed the terminal phase, his AUC0-t is about 17% of his AUC0-inf, also check his figure

[image]

What we could do?

1- Extrapolate to 72 h
2- Use AUC common (0-12)
3- or based on the results of the current study could we make another stage on 12 subjects (knowing that the first one was performed on 24)?
4- Exclude the subject from stat evaluation of AUC(0-t) and include in all other parameters (as long as it does not jeopardize the acceptance of the study)

looking forward to your opinion
thanks

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 03:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5