speed? [R for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-04-30 12:38 (101 d 18:08 ago) – Posting: # 21370
Views: 10,585

Hi Yung-jin,

» R v4.0.0 seems running faster on Windows …

Really? I removed 3.6.3 yesterday. If you still have it, can you do me a favor and perform a demanding check (sample size by 105 subject simulations for a partial replicate design with heterogenicity, the EMA’s approach of reference-scaling, assumed T/R-ratio 0.9, target power 0.8):

library(PowerTOST)
if (packageVersion("PowerTOST") < "1.4.8") {
  stop("Please install the latest version from CRAN.")
} else {
  CVp <- 0.4                                      # pooled CVw
  CV  <- signif(CVp2CV(CV = CVp, ratio = 2.5), 4) # CVwT > CVwR
  system.time(sampleN.scABEL.sdsims(CV = CV, design = "2x3x3",
                                    print = FALSE)[["Sample size"]])[3]
}


BTW, I love that in 4.0.0 the default of stringsAsFactors was changed to FALSE.
Something I regularly forgot in imports or assigning data.frames;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,989 posts in 4,375 threads, 1,460 registered users;
online 9 (1 registered, 8 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 06:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5