Common sense instead of statistics [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-04-27 11:45 (838 d 14:57 ago) – Posting: # 21351
Views: 5,738

Hi vixen,

» I like Helmut's suggestion to assess achievement of SS for individual subjects.

My suggestion dates back to 2007. A while ago…
I don’t use it since 2010 and don’t recommend it any more (see this presentation, slide 14). Furthermore, the EMA stated:*

A specific statistical method to assure that steady state has been reached is not considered necessary in bioequivalence studies. Descriptive data is sufficient.


» I wonder though whether I should evaluate the Cpds on a normal or logarithmic scale.

Normal – otherwise you cannot deal with BQLs and missings.

» What is your approach?

See the presentation.



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,301 posts in 4,667 threads, 1,585 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 02:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No written law has ever been more binding than
unwritten custom supported by popular opinion.    Carrie Chapman Catt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5