Science vs. regulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – Jordan, 2020-04-23 14:11 (362 d 13:20 ago) – Posting: # 21345
Views: 10,398

Dear Helmut and all,

Hope everyone is good and safe.

The same query raised by MoH and i want to answer. Could you help me?

» IR or MR formulation? If MR, DR or CR?
IR

» Pilot studies performed? If yes, outcome?
No

» Sampling planned based on average t½ from the literature? If yes, please give x±SD and sample size in your study.
The last two time point was 24.00 & 48.00. It was planned based on PARs (12.00 & 24.00 was the last time point in two PARs). 36 subjects

» Observed t½ (x±SD, range)?
For reference (10.03 ±4.09, 3.5-19.0)
For test (9.2 ±2.96, 3.22-17.0)

» tmax, tlast?
For reference: Tmax: 0.67, Tlast: 28.25
For test: Tmax: 0.50, Tlast: 23.91

Forgive me for the formatting. I tried my best.
Regards.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 03:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5