Science vs. regulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – 2020-04-23 16:11 (1314 d 18:16 ago) – Posting: # 21345
Views: 15,328

Dear Helmut and all,

Hope everyone is good and safe.

The same query raised by MoH and i want to answer. Could you help me?

IR or MR formulation? If MR, DR or CR?

IR

Pilot studies performed? If yes, outcome?

No

Sampling planned based on average t½ from the literature? If yes, please give x±SD and sample size in your study.

The last two time point was 24.00 & 48.00. It was planned based on PARs (12.00 & 24.00 was the last time point in two PARs). 36 subjects

Observed t½ (x±SD, range)?

For reference (10.03 ±4.09, 3.5-19.0)
For test (9.2 ±2.96, 3.22-17.0)

tmax, tlast?

For reference: Tmax: 0.67, Tlast: 28.25
For test: Tmax: 0.50, Tlast: 23.91

Forgive me for the formatting. I tried my best.
Regards.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,811 posts in 4,783 threads, 1,642 registered users;
9 visitors (0 registered, 9 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:27 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Every man gets a narrower and narrower field of knowledge
in which he must be an expert in order to compete with other people.
The specialist knows more and more about less and less
and finally knows everything about nothing.    Konrad Lorenz

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5