Meets primary objective but not secondary objective [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by kratos – India, 2020-04-01 02:00 (786 d 17:46 ago) – Posting: # 21312
Views: 1,555

Totally agree.
I cringe when some CROs state 'monitoring subject safety' as a secondary objective in a Bioequivalence study !

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,110 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 19:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz