Meets primary objective but not secondary objective [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by kratos – India, 2020-04-01 04:00 (1916 d 18:43 ago) – Posting: # 21312
Views: 3,213

Totally agree.
I cringe when some CROs state 'monitoring subject safety' as a secondary objective in a Bioequivalence study !

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,679 registered users;
37 visitors (0 registered, 37 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I think it is much more interesting to live with uncertainty
than to live with answers that might be wrong.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5