protocol amendment that may trigger Group effect test [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-03-24 10:07 (1764 d 00:27 ago) – Posting: # 21298
Views: 2,911

Hi Silke,

❝ Situation:

❝ 1st period was dosed in 1 group and completed in CRO 1

❝ 2nd period must now be performed at a different CRO (CRO 2)

❝ 2nd period must be performed in 2 groups in CRO 2


That's annoying :-)

❝ Protocol amendment:

❝ Switch in CRO including all tasks

❝ due to the change of dosing in 1 group to 2 groups in period 2 the washout will be different between the two groups.


❝ Does this trigger the evaluation of a group effect, although the groups may only be separated by 1 week?


❝ Is there special statistics we need to consider to address this properly?


In my opinion it is not overly informative to do a group analysis here, at least not within the fit which provides for the evaluation of BE (here it is a kind of "accidental group within period within CRO", where period somehow is indistinguishable from CRO :surprised::ponder:).

Can you switch the volunteers to the other CRO, or has it become a parallel trial rather than a crossover trial by now?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,363 posts in 4,906 threads, 1,679 registered users;
116 visitors (1 registered, 115 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:34 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The combination of some data and an aching desire
for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer
can be extracted from a given body of data.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5