protocol amendment that may trigger Group effect test [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-03-24 08:07 (215 d 03:08 ago) – Posting: # 21298
Views: 1,295

Hi Silke,

» Situation:
» 1st period was dosed in 1 group and completed in CRO 1
» 2nd period must now be performed at a different CRO (CRO 2)
» 2nd period must be performed in 2 groups in CRO 2

That's annoying :-)

» Protocol amendment:
» Switch in CRO including all tasks
» due to the change of dosing in 1 group to 2 groups in period 2 the washout will be different between the two groups.
»
» Does this trigger the evaluation of a group effect, although the groups may only be separated by 1 week?
»
» Is there special statistics we need to consider to address this properly?

In my opinion it is not overly informative to do a group analysis here, at least not within the fit which provides for the evaluation of BE (here it is a kind of "accidental group within period within CRO", where period somehow is indistinguishable from CRO :surprised::ponder:).

Can you switch the volunteers to the other CRO, or has it become a parallel trial rather than a crossover trial by now?

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

No, of course you do not need to audit your CRO if it was inspected in 1968 by the agency of Crabongostan.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 11:15 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself,
but talent instantly recognizes genius.    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5