FDA: 2×2×4 design; RSABE + ABE + σwT/σwR [Design Issues]

posted by Pharma_88 – India, 2020-03-13 09:14 (805 d 11:15 ago) – Posting: # 21262
Views: 2,902

» All of the product-specific guidances contain a section ‘Explanation’. See also Yu et al.

OK

» » Further, can we perform crossover studies for NTI by taking extra safety measurement in to the study?
»
» You can. Whether that is necessary in healthy volunteers depends on the drug.

Yes.

» » Further, what is the BE limit for such drugs?
»
» It depends on \(\small{s_{wR}}\) observed in the study, i.e., reference-scaling is applied. Furthermore – irrespective of passing the scaled limits – the study has to pass 80.00–125.00% as well and the upper confidence limit of \(\small{\sigma_{wT}/\sigma_{wR}}\) has to be ≤2.5.

its common for all NTI or its varies from drug to drug?


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,110 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 21:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5