Underrepresentation of female subjects in BE study to register Generic [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ping4santosh  – India, 2020-03-11 16:15 (801 d 17:29 ago) – Posting: # 21254
Views: 3,979

Hi ElMaestro,

It's not a random flutter. Females actually fall back on bioequivalncy. Cmax at 75% and range was lower too. Pioneer product behaved similar way. So it's not random. You are right. The females also has higher variance.

I didn't understand your last statement. Can you kindly clarify?

» Yes, you can likely conduct the study in males. But why would you if you think the conclusion in males can be extrapolated

Cheers,

SKM

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 21 (0 registered, 21 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 10:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5