Underrepresentation of female subjects in BE study to register Generic [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-03-11 16:24 (996 d 06:54 ago) – Posting: # 21252
Views: 4,121

Hi SKM,

it sounds like random flutter or a gender x treatment interaction? It could also be that the females increase variance, and this, I think, may be somewhat more likely.
Please show the data. Can you send us the STDM and ADAM datasets? :-D

❝ Can we conduct the pivotal study only in Males? Can we extrapolate the conclusions obtained in males to females. What would be the regulatory challenges and please prove some references that can guide me on this.


There are no directly relevant references. Generally speaking the innovator industry has been exploring lots and lots of opportunity for claiming population x treatment interactions, but it has so far been without much evidence.
Yes, you can likely conduct the study in males. But why would you if you think the conclusion in males can be extrapolated.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,423 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,600 registered users;
12 visitors (0 registered, 12 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:18 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5