Underrepresentation of female subjects in BE study to register Generic [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-03-11 15:24 (198 d 00:58 ago) – Posting: # 21252
Views: 3,346

Hi SKM,

it sounds like random flutter or a gender x treatment interaction? It could also be that the females increase variance, and this, I think, may be somewhat more likely.
Please show the data. Can you send us the STDM and ADAM datasets? :-D

» Can we conduct the pivotal study only in Males? Can we extrapolate the conclusions obtained in males to females. What would be the regulatory challenges and please prove some references that can guide me on this.

There are no directly relevant references. Generally speaking the innovator industry has been exploring lots and lots of opportunity for claiming population x treatment interactions, but it has so far been without much evidence.
Yes, you can likely conduct the study in males. But why would you if you think the conclusion in males can be extrapolated.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

R's base package has 274 reserved words and operators, along with 1761 functions. I can use 18 of them (about 14 of them properly). I believe this makes me the Donald Trump of programming.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,075 posts in 4,394 threads, 1,468 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 17:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you think it’s simple,
then you have misunderstood the problem.    Bjarne Stroustrup

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5